Management Discussion and Analysis

The Company's future success depends on its ability to satisfy changing customer demands by offering innovative products in a timely manner and maintaining such products' competitiveness and quality.

The Company's competitors may gain significant advantages if they are able to offer products satisfying customer needs earlier than the Company is able to, which could adversely impact the Company's sales, results of operations and financial condition. Unanticipated delays or cost overruns in implementing new product launches, expansion plans or capacity enhancements could also materially and adversely impact the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Climate change concerns and the promotion of new technologies, such as autopilot, encourage customers to look beyond standard factors (such as price, design, performance, brand image or comfort and features) in favor of more fuel efficient, convenient and environmentally friendly vehicles. As a result of the public discourse on climate change and volatile fuel prices, the Company faces more stringent government regulations, imposition of speed limits and higher taxes on sports utility vehicles or premium automobiles. The Company endeavours to take account these factors, and is focused on researching, developing and producing new drive technologies, such as hybrid engines and electric cars. The Company also investing in development programs to reduce fuel consumption through the use of lightweight materials, reducing parasitic losses through the driveline and improving aerodynamics. Coupled with consumer preferences, a failure to achieve the Company's planned objectives or delays in developing fuel efficient products could materially affect the Company's ability to sell premium passenger cars and large or medium-sized all-terrain vehicles at current or targeted volume levels, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's general business activity, net assets, financial position and results of operations. In addition, a deterioration in the quality of the Company's vehicles could force the Company to incur substantial costs and damage its reputation. There is a risk that competitors or joint ventures set up by competitors will develop better solutions and will be able to manufacture the resulting products more rapidly, in larger quantities, with a higher quality and/or at a lower cost. It is possible that the Company could then be compelled to make new investments in researching and developing other technologies to maintain its existing market share or to win back the market share lost to competitors. Finally, the Company's manufacturing operations and sales may be subject to potential physical impacts of climate change, including changes in weather patterns and an increased potential for extreme weather events, which could affect the manufacture and distribution of the Company's products and the cost and availability of raw materials and components.

Private and commercial users of transportation increasingly use modes of transportation other than the automobile. The reasons for this include the rising costs of automotive transport, increasing traffic density in major cities and environmental awareness. Furthermore, the increased use of car-sharing concepts and other innovative mobility initiatives facilitates access to other methods of transport, thereby reducing dependency on the private automobile. Furthermore, non-traditional market participants may dependency on the private automobile altogether. A shift in consumer preferences away from private automobiles would have a material adverse effect on the Company's general business activity and on sales, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

To stimulate demand, competitors in the automotive industry have offered customers and dealers price reductions on vehicles and services, which has led to increased price pressures and sharpened competition within the industry. As a provider of numerous high-volume models, the Company's profitability and cash flows are significantly affected by the risk of rising competitive price pressures. Special sales incentives and increased price pressures in the new car business also influence price levels in the used car market, with a negative effect on vehicle resale values. This may have a negative impact on the profitability of the used car business in the Company's dealer organization.

There can be no assurance that the Company's new models will meet its sales expectations, in which case the Company may be unable to realize the intended economic benefits of the Company's investments, which would in turn materially affect the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, there is a risk that the Company's quality standards can be maintained only by incurring substantial costs for monitoring and quality assurance. For the Company's customers, one of the determining factors in purchasing its vehicles is the high quality of the products.

A decrease in the quality of the Company's vehicles (or if the public were to have the impression that such a decrease in quality had occurred) could damage the Company's image and reputation as a premium automobile manufacturer and in turn materially affect the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, product development cycles can be lengthy, and there is no assurance that new designs will lead to revenues from vehicle sales, or that the Company will be able to accurately forecast demand for its vehicles, potentially leading to inefficient use of the Company's production capacity. Additionally, the Company's high proportion of fixed costs, due to the Company's significant investment in property, plant and equipment, further exacerbates the risks associated with incorrectly assessing demand for its vehicles.

The Company is subject to risks associated with product liability warranties and recalls.

The Company is subjected to risks and costs associated with product liability, warranties and recalls in connection with performance, compliance or safety-related issues affecting the Company's products which may, in turn, cause the Company's customers to question the safety or reliability of its vehicles and thus result in a materially adverse effect on its business, impacting its reputation, results from operations and financial condition. Such events could also require the Company to expend considerable resources to remediate, and the Company may be subject to class actions, other large-scale product liability, or other lawsuits in various jurisdictions where the Company conducts business. In May 2016, an industry-wide passenger airbag safety recall was announced in the United States by the National Highway Traffic System Administration or NHTSA, in respect of airbags from Takata Corporation or Takata, a supplier of airbags. Certain front-passenger airbags supplied by Takata were installed in vehicles sold by Jaguar Land Rover. The Company considered the cost associated with the recall to be an adjusting post-balance sheet event and recognized an additional provision of GB£ 67.4 million for the estimated cost of repairs in its income statement for Fiscal 2016. The Company expects to utilize such provision over the next one to four years.

Furthermore, the Company may also be subject to class actions or other large-scale product liability or other lawsuits in various jurisdictions in which the Company may have a significant presence. The use of shared components in vehicle production increases this risk because individual components are deployed in a number of different models across the Company's brands. Any costs incurred or lost sales caused by product liability, warranties and recalls could materially adversely affect the Company's business.

Any disruption in the supply of automobile components could have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations.

Adverse economic conditions, a decline in automobile demand and lack of access to sufficient financing arrangements, among others, could have a negative financial impact on the Company's suppliers, thereby impairing timely availability of components to the Company or causing increase in the costs of components. In addition, if one or more of the other global automotive manufacturers were to become insolvent, this would have an adverse effect on the Company's supply chains and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

The Company's Jaguar Land Rover has also entered into supply agreements with Ford and certain other third parties for critical components and remain reliant upon Ford and the Ford-PSA joint venture for a portion of Jaguar Land Rover engines. However, following the launch of the EMC in Wolverhampton, Jaguar Land Rover now also manufactures its own "in-house" engines. The Company may not be able to manufacture certain types of engines or find a suitable replacement supplier in a timely manner in the event of any disruption in the supply of engines, or parts of engines, and other hardware or services provided to Jaguar Land Rover by Ford or the Ford-PSA joint venture and such disruption could have a material adverse impact on the Company's operations, business and/or financial condition.

A change in requirements under long-term supply arrangements committing Jaguar Land Rover to purchase minimum or fixed quantities of certain parts, or to pay a minimum amount to the seller, could have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. The Company have entered into a number of long-term supply contracts that require Jaguar Land Rover to purchase a fixed quantity of parts to be used in the production of Jaguar Land Rover vehicles (e.g., "take-or-pay" contracts). If the need for any of these parts were to lessen, Jaguar Land Rover could still be required to purchase a specified quantity of the part or pay a minimum amount to the seller pursuant to the take-or-pay contract, which could have a substantial adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

Increases in input prices may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

In Fiscal 2017 and 2016, the consumption of raw materials, components and aggregates and purchase of products for sale (including changes in inventory) constituted approximately 60.4% and 58.8%, respectively, of the Company's total revenues. Prices of commodity items used in manufacturing automobiles, including steel, aluminum, copper, zinc, rubber, platinum, palladium and rhodium, have become increasingly volatile in recent years. Further price movements would closely depend on the evolving economic scenarios across the globe. While the Company continues to pursue cost reduction initiatives, an increase in price of input materials could severely impact the Company's profitability to the extent such increase cannot be absorbed by the market through price increases and/or could have a negative impact on demand. In addition, an increased price and supply risk could arise from the need for rare and frequently sought-after raw materials for which demand is high, such as rare earths, which are predominantly found in China. Rare earth metal prices and supply remain uncertain. In the past, China has limited the export of rare earths from time to time. Due to intense price competition and the Company's high level of fixed costs, the Company may not be able to adequately address changes in commodity prices even if they are foreseeable. Increases in fuel costs also pose a significant challenge, especially in the commercial and premium vehicle categories where increased fuel prices have an impact on demand. If the Company is unable to find substitutes for supplies of raw materials or pass price increases on to customers, or to safeguard the supply of scarce raw materials, the Company's vehicle production, business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The Company manages these risks through the use of fixed supply contracts with tenor upto 12 months and the use of financial derivatives pursuant to a defined hedging policy. The Company enters into a variety of foreign currency, interest rates and commodity forward contracts and options to manage the Company's exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity price risk. These financial exposures are managed in accordance with the Company's risk management policies and procedures. The Company uses foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations relating to highly probable forecast transactions. The Company also enters into interest rate swaps and interest rate currency swap agreements, mainly to manage exposure on the Company's fixed rate or variable rate debt. The Company further uses interest rate derivatives or currency swaps to hedge exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on principal and interest payments for borrowings denominated in foreign currencies. Specific transactional risks include risks like liquidity and pricing risks, interest rate and exchange rate fluctuation risks, volatility risks, counterparty risks, settlement risks and gearing risks. However, the hedging transactions may not adequately protect the Company against these risks. In addition, if markets move adversely, the Company may incur financial losses on such hedging transactions, the financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

The significant reliance of the Company and Jaguar Land Rover on key markets increases the risk of the negative impact of reduced customer demand in those countries.

The Company and Jaguar Land Rover, relies on the United Kingdom, Chinese, North American and continental European markets. Any decline in demand for the Company's and Jaguar Land Rover's vehicles in these key markets may significantly impact the Company's business, growth prospects, financial position and results of operations. Further, decreased demand for the Company's and Jaguar Land Rover's products may not be sufficiently mitigated by new product launches and expansion into growing markets, which could have a significant adverse impact on the Company's financial performance.

The Company is exposed to liquidity risks.

The Company's main sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, the existing notes, external debt in the form of factoring discount facilities and other revolving credit facilities. However, adverse changes in the global economic and financial environment may result in lower consumer demand for vehicles, and prevailing conditions in credit markets may adversely affect both consumer demand and the cost and availability of finance for the Company's business and operations. If the global economy goes back into recession and consumer demand for the Company's vehicles drops, as a result of higher oil prices, excessive public debt or for any other reasons, and the supply of external financing becomes limited, the Company may again face significant liquidity risks.

The Company is also subject to various types of restrictions or impediments on the ability of companies in its Group in certain countries to transfer cash across the Group through loans or interim dividends. These restrictions or impediments are caused by exchange controls, withholding taxes on dividends and distributions and other similar restrictions in the markets in which the Company operates. The cash in some of these jurisdictions is subject to certain restrictions on cash pooling, intercompany loan arrangements or interim dividends.

Exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations could materially and adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's operations are subject to risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates with reference to countries in which it operates. The Company imports capital equipment, raw materials and components from, manufacture vehicles in, and sell vehicles into, various countries, and therefore, its revenues and costs have significant exposure to the relative movements of the GB£, the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Russian Ruble, the Chinese Renminbi, the Singapore dollar, the Japanese Yen, the Australian dollar, the South African rand, the Thai baht, the Korean won and the Indian rupee.

The United Kingdom's exit from the European Union could also have a negative impact on the growth of the UK economy and cause greater volatility in the pound sterling. This could directly impact the Company's sales volumes and financial results, as the Company derives the majority of its revenues from overseas markets and source significant levels of raw materials and components from Europe, which may result in decrease in profits to the extent of non-British pound costs, are not fully mitigated by non-British pound sales.

Moreover, the Company has an outstanding foreign currency denominated debt and is sensitive to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company has experienced and could expect in the future to experience foreign exchange losses on obligations denominated in foreign currencies in respect of its borrowings and foreign currency assets and liabilities due to currency fluctuations.

The Company has both interest-bearing assets (including cash balances) and interest-bearing liabilities, which bear interest at variable rates. The Company is therefore exposed to changes in interest rates. Although the Company engages in managing its interest and foreign exchange exposure through use of financial hedging instruments, such as forward contracts, swap agreements and option contracts, higher interest rates and a weakening of the Indian rupee against major foreign currencies could significantly increase its cost of borrowing, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

The Company is exposed to the risk that appropriate hedging lines for the type of risk exposures it is subjected to may not be available at a reasonable cost, particularly during volatile rate movements, or at all. Moreover, there are risks associated with the use of such hedging instruments. Whilst mitigating to some degree the Company's exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the Company potentially forgo benefits that might result from market fluctuations in currency exposures. These hedging transactions can also result in substantial losses. Such losses could occur under various circumstances, including, without limitation, any circumstances in which a counterparty does not perform its obligations under the applicable hedging arrangement (despite having ISDA agreements in place with each of the Company's hedging counterparties), currency fluctuations, the arrangement is imperfect or ineffective, or the Company's internal hedging policies and procedures are not followed or do not work as planned. In addition, because the Company's potential obligations under the financial hedging instruments are marked to market, the Company may experience quarterly and annual volatility in its operating results and cash flows attributable to its financial hedging activities.

A decline in retail customers' purchasing power or consumer confidence or in corporate customers' financial condition and willingness to invest could materially and adversely affect the Company's business.

Demand for vehicles for personal use generally depends on consumers' net purchasing power, their confidence in future economic developments and changes in fashion and trends, while demand for vehicles for commercial use by corporate customers (including fleet customers) primarily depends on the customers' financial condition, their willingness to invest (motivated by expected future business prospects) and available financing. A decrease in potential customers' disposable income or their financial flexibility or an increase in the cost of financing will generally have a negative impact on demand for the Company's products. A weak macroeconomic environment, combined with restrictive lending and a low level of consumer sentiment generally, may reduce consumers' net purchasing power and lead existing and potential customers to refrain from purchasing a new vehicle, to defer a purchase further or to purchase a smaller model with less equipment at a lower price. A deteriorating macroeconomic environment may disproportionately reduce demand for luxury vehicles. It also leads to reluctance by corporate customers to invest in vehicles for commercial use and/or to lease vehicles, resulting in a postponement of fleet renewal contracts.